James Alan Fox: There Is No Evidence of an ‘Epidemic of Mass Shootings’

Help Us Keep This Site Going During The Internet Purge

The nation’s leading scholar of mass shootings explains how media coverage of horrific events such as El Paso and Dayton stoke unwarranted fear and anxiety.

NICK GILLESPIE | 8.14.2019 3:30 PM

James Alan Fox (James Alan Fox)Audio Player00:0000:00Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.Download

James Alan Fox: There Is No Evidence of an ‘Epidemic of Mass Shootings’

The horrific mass killings in El Paso and Dayton have understandably inspired terror in America and calls for expanded gun controlpredictive policing, and mental health interventions designed to reduce violence.

But Northeastern University criminologist James Alan Fox, the leading researcher on the topic for the past 35 years, tells Reason, “There is no evidence that we are in the midst of an epidemic of mass shootings.” The number of incidents and casualties are simply too small to make such claims and, he stresses, the media coverage of shootings often ends up creating a false sense that gun violence—which is at or near historic lows—is ubiquitous and growing.

READ  Judge Tracie Hunter Dragged Out of Court to Serve Six Months Jail Time

In a wide-ranging interview with Nick Gillespie, Fox explains the common characteristics of mass killers, why violent crime involving guns has declined over the past several decades, and how cable TV and social media contribute to a false sense of panic.

Don’t let Silicon Valley control what you see. Get more stories like this in your inbox, every day.

Name *

Email *